[UPDATE :: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 -
Non-Apology Apology - Silence]
Is it right to gloat? Bask in the light of total redemption, total justification and total exoneration? Tell me it is, because that's what this post is about –
PERSONAL VINDICATION.
By God, when you are right,
YOU ARE RIGHT! In my case, after enduring more than two years of incessant public personal slanderous and threatening attacks that were NEVER rectified, I have, if anyone does, every right to flaunt the gloating.
Almighty God DOES smile upon His little children. Vindication ALWAYS comes to he who waits and let me tell you, it is so, so sweet. OKAY, enough with the gloating. Here's what happened when I picked up the Sunday Times-Standard newspaper and worked my way to reading,
Next stop, Africa: American imperialism on the march – and when I got to the third paragraph, I almost couldn't believe what I saw ... What I read made my heart skip a beat, but maybe I'd better explain.
That "happy faced" picture, that one you see there on the right, is the face of a guy that goes by the name of Dave Stancliff. That innocent looking “happy face” hides the soul of a man that publicly and shamelessly castigated, denigrated, blatantly lied and viciously accused me of all kinds of filthy, obscene and malicious actions and intentions directed against him and to him, not to mention to his pug-ugly dog. What did I do to so offend his infantile sensibilities? Nothing more than make the simple observation about his "knee-jerk" reaction that he published in the Times-Standard newspaper under his Opinion column:
As It Stands. His personal attacks became so extreme that he even threatened to assault my family with some sort of lawsuit or criminal action. Mind you, that was on top of his threat against me of being some sort of Internet stalker and crazy, radical terrorist. Apparently, someone convinced him that his documented abusive conduct, over-the-top threats, and constant invective, were criminal in nature if not in intent. Eventually, he stopped his campaign, at least I think he did.
The irony of what he tried to do two and one half years ago, enforce his own brand of Imperialism is exactly what he is railing against today. He did everything he could think of, used every opportunity he could conjure up to try to force me, either by tacit inference or open admission that he had the right to judge me as some sort of sub-human meaningless person that dared question him or his opinions. His definition of "Imperialism" can be applied to himself because it is exactly what he tried, and to a certain extent within the Internet blogosphere, achieved a measure of success:
"Imperialism is defined as extending a nation's (or nationalistic [someone devoted to self] person's -) authority by territorial acquisition (taking a person's reputation and personal legitimacy through forced submission to to act and be as they are as a valued individual) or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations (through deprivation of one's credibility, acceptance and recognition as an independent individual through malicious lies and accusations designed to control the minds and beliefs of others).
For anyone
interested, here is the link that started all of this that proofs the above definition. Note the date:
Sunday, May 31, 2009. The title of my article was:
Trolls versus The Thought Police.
Two years later he's still going at me: Title of this article and updates:
Goody Two-Shoes. Do a
search on the
Report's WordPress Blog under Dave Stancliff, start at
the bottom and work back and you'll find it's all there, Dave Stancliff in all his glory – that is
if you have the stomach to go through all that crap.
Stancliff even posted a couple of his own and offered a reward to
anyone that could identify the author of the Joe Blow Report.
He started out with this link on his blog. - June 3, 2009. Then there were the apologists' incessant blather - one in particular:
Ernie Branscomb. He wrote and posted a blog article defending Dave Stancliff's conduct, joining and supporting him with his own unjustified public invective.
So you can see, this whole episode got right down dirty, vicious and nasty mean. Dave
Stancliff would make up all kinds of filthy, lying accusations then turn
right around and do exactly what he was accusing me of doing. And –
There he goes again! Only this time, he's admitted to being and doing exactly as observed in that "Trolls" commentary.
Here is what he said in today's
Times-Standard newspaper, Sunday Edition,
October 30, 2011 –
As It Stands. I quote his admission:
“Of
course, I really didn't understand its full meaning and
admittedly didn't go out of my way to find it out. Instead, I
went with a knee-jerk reaction and put the word in my Commie
file.” [Emphasis added]
Is that bald-faced admission that totally justifies my very first observations of his opinion writings in the Times-Standard newspaper NOT a thing of beauty? What makes it
a thing of beauty is where it puts him and those that supported him
in his bullying, servile war against me and my credibility. They owe
me a public apology.
What Dave Stancliff refused to accept as well as everyone that supported him, including the Editors at the Times-Standard is that it was Dave Stancliff that lost his credibility and legitimacy, neutralizing the value of everything he subsequently said that they published. That fact is established in the quality or lack thereof in the paper's reporting as defined by his exact statement quoted above. So...
Do you see it now, Dave Stancliff? How about you, Ernie Branscomb? And you, too, Eric Kirk? What about the Times-Standard Editorial Management, Kimberly Wear – is all the personal filthy diatribe and invective still justified? Who among you has the character, moral fortitude and common decency to do what is right, dignified and honorable?
Dave Stancliff's exposure that May day to the Joe Blow Report was, in fact, his first encounter with someone in the vanguard of the worldwide Occupy Movement. His knee-jerk reactions are completely consistent with how the Occupy Movement is held in total disgust, ridicule and disdain. Here's a good example by Rush Limbaugh:
"These protestors, who are actually few in number, have contributed nothing. They're parasites. They're pure, genuine parasites. Many of them are bored, trust-fund kids, obsessed with being something, being somebody. Meaningless lives, they want to matter." [Emphasis added]
More importantly, however, and in stark contrast to his historical attitude and actions, Dave Stancliff's
As It Stands opinion article today is basically
about making peace in this world by ending the American Elite's domination through brutal
military or police suppression and looting everything of value. I've attached it to the end of this
post and included links to the Times-Standard because it is well worth reading. Of late, Dave Stancliff has
upped his game and began writing about matters of common interest,
that are pertinent and timely to the local readers. Lets see if he can practice what he
preaches, at least from a positive point of view. Real peace starts at home - it starts with oneself. He says he tracks my Internet activity. Let's see if he has the moral character and personal integrity to be the person he claims to possess such standing in this community, to step up to being the kind of real man he thinks he is.
Jerk:
Slang. a contemptibly naive, fatuous, foolish, or inconsequential person.
