Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Malevolent Insane JEW

[UPDATE Below - The Jews slaughter the Palestinian people as they are ALL Hamas.]

Published in the Times-Standard Newspaper for California North Coast readers:





The despotism of these insane Jews knows no limits. Blaming the victim for Jew's deliberate murder of women and children in their insane attempt to justify the brutal slaughter of an occupied and oppressed people is the ultimate act of wanton terror. What the Jews are doing to the Palestinian people puts the whole human population on trial - everyone's legitimate existence is on the docket.

The latest atrocity: ‘Shells were chasing them’: Four Palestinian children killed on beach by Israeli rockets 

Another atrocity: State Department Responds to Israel’s Bombing of Children Playing on Gaza Beach by Blaming Hamas - The ultimate perversion, blame the victim.
And another atrocity: (Protecting the Jew media propaganda.) NBC News Pulls Veteran Reporter from Gaza After Witnessing Israeli Attack on Children
The atrocities grow as the Jews massacre innocent Palestinian people - Yes they are people: Deadly Sunday in Gaza: At least 87 Palestinians & 13 Israeli soldiers killed - AND - ‘Shejaia massacre’ in Gaza prompts urgent UN Security Council meeting
[Source]
--Joe

Saturday, July 12, 2014

This Aberration Called JEW

This scum, unfit to use as natural fertilizer, is going into the sea - or burn in fiery hell.

The following is a terrorist's rational for butchering helpless women and children. I'm posting the commentary of Joshua Hantman, senior adviser to Israel’s ambassador to the United States in it's entirety as spoken on Democracy Now. It is his kind of beliefs that enunciates the thinking that condemns and judges the Jew by Universal Law as unfit and illegitimate to live on this Earth. The barbarity spoken here is gut-wrenching sick. The Bible's Peter says regarding such people: "By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men." (2 Peter 3:7 NIV) Hantman and his bloody Jews are living epitome of "ungodly men."

The Jews, call them Zionist, Israelis, whatever you want - to me they are all illegitimate humans unfit to populate this Earth. They are a malignant cancer killing all humanity. Their grand scheme as terrorists was to eradicate the land of Palestine of its local population for themselves; setting themselves up with their own sovereign nation called Israel. With the help of another terrorist nation that was successful in doing the same thing, they managed to take some of the land, but could not justify the butchery required to exterminate the Palestinians, so they waged a 66 year war on the Palestinian people to get them to try to defend themselves - commit acts of aggression in self-defence - that the Jews could use as justification for their genocide. The Jews in 66 years never stopped killing Palestinian people. Nor did they ever stop trying to get the Palestinian people to justify their right to kill them - read Joshua Hantman below.

Democracy Now: 

As Palestinian Deaths Top 100, Who’s to Blame for Escalating Violence? What Can Be Done?

JOSHUA HANTMAN: Well, let’s be clear: Israel is currently under attack. I mean, the professor talked about occupation right now. Let me remind you that Israel actually left the Gaza Strip in 2005. We removed all of our settlements. We removed the IDF forces. We took out 10,000 Jews from their houses as a step for peace, because Israel wants peace and it extended its hand for peace. That was in 2005. Since 2005, over 8,000 rockets, missiles and mortars have been indiscriminately fired at our civilians.

Now, the professor also talked about human rights and about international law. Hamas, the internationally recognized terrorist organization, controls the Gaza Strip. They are hiding behind civilians while firing at our civilians. Let me remind you that just yesterday the Hamas interior minister—the Hamas Interior Ministry, they called for their people, for their civilians, to act as human shields. Their spokesperson also came out and said, "Come and act as human shields," because while we mourn every civilian death on both sides, Hamas celebrates civilian deaths.

I blame Hamas for every civilian death, because while we send text messages and phone calls and even put warning shots in the areas where we’re going to try and take out the terrorist infrastructure and the particular terrorists, Hamas fire from mosques, they fire from next to houses, they fire from schools. They keep their missiles and their rockets in the basements of houses. This is a double war crime. They are firing at our civilians indiscriminately. I mean, they fired yesterday towards Jerusalem, OK. They’re firing at Jerusalem indiscriminately. What would happen if one of these rockets landed in an Arab area in Jerusalem? Or if, God forbid, it hit a holy site of the Muslims? It’s indiscriminate fire. It’s a war crime. I actually spoke to a lawyer yesterday who told me there are five or six war crimes that Hamas is guilty of. You cannot blame occupation because Israel left in 2005. And one more point—

JOSHUA HANTMAN: Ma’am, you know, as an international lawyer, that as soon as you put munitions within a house or fire from within a house or fire from within a schoolyard, that becomes a military target. No country in the world would accept a situation whereby over three-quarters of their population are under direct rocket fire. Ma’am, just imagine—just imagine if the United States had over 200 million of its population under rocket fire from an internationally recognized terrorist organization, which, by the way, I’m sure you are not defending here, because Hamas, they wouldn’t allow a young, liberal, secular woman to express her views like you do, ma’am. They would not allow my gay friends to express their sexuality freely. They would not allow Jews to open synagogues or Christians to open churches. This is an Islamist, fundamentalist organization that you’re sitting here defending. And I also assume, ma’am, that you don’t justify their use of human shields, which they openly talk about. They’re proud about it, ma’am. They don’t hide the fact that they use human shields. I take it you would join me in condemning this.

JOSHUA HANTMAN: Let me actually correct you, because this escalation was started by Hamas. And if you look, what the professor said is completely incorrect. The truce was not held by Hamas. And every single month for the last decade, rockets have been fired into Israel. Even after November 2012, where we had this Operation Pillar of Defense, and we restored the deterrents, you know how many rockets were fired in 2013, the quietest year in a decade? There were still 76 rockets fired at Israel, 76 indiscriminate rockets fired at our kids, fired at our old people, fired at our women. This—

AMY GOODMAN: But could you respond to this issue of the deaths?

JOSHUA HANTMAN: Yes, ma’am. I’m going to get—I’m going to get to it, ma’am.

AMY GOODMAN: You’ve got over a hundred Palestinians who have now been killed.

JOSHUA HANTMAN: I’m going to get—well, first of all, I’ve already said that for Israel, any civilian death is not only a tragedy, but it’s a failure, as well. And we review every single operation and every single strike to see how we can improve. We’ve hit over 800 targets to try and stop these rockets, to try and stop this indiscriminate missile fire against our civilians. Out of those 800 targets, I’ll be honest, the precision—the precision is quite outstanding. And there is no military in the history of the world that has actually used such precision targets. I mean, think about it from a military tactics point of view. We tell our enemies—we tell Hamas where we’re going to hit. We tell them with text messages, with phone calls, with leaflets. We tell them in order to get civilians out of harm’s way. But for them, civilian death is actually—it’s actually a success. This is what they want. And—

JOSHUA HANTMAN: My counterpart—my counterpart would not condemn this use of human shields, which Hamas is proud about. They call it—they call for it on TV. They said it—their spokesperson said it yesterday. Their Interior Ministry put out a press release saying, "Palestinians, come to the roofs. Stay in the homes where we’re firing the rockets from." It’s disgusting. And I would like her to actually condemn it.

NOURA ERAKAT: I absolutely consider it reprehensible. What straight-minded person would actually accept that? That’s not the point. I’ve repeatedly explained that Palestinians are not robots who listen to Hamas. They care about their children and their families. This—

AMY GOODMAN: Noura Erakat, what do you think needs to happen, in this last minute that we have?

NOURA ERAKAT: You know, what really needs to happen is what has needed to happen for over 66 years of the displacement and dispossession of Palestinians, over 47 years of military occupation and continuing colonial expansion, which is the lifting of the siege, the end of the occupation, equality for all in Palestine, without distinction—Palestine and Israel, without distinction to religion, as Israel would have us believe. The entirety of the Israeli state is built on the premise of a demographic equation that needs and necessitates a Jewish majority. That should make us all concerned and raise red flags for us and make us stop before we call it the only democracy the Middle East and continue to fund it another year with $3.1 billion without any accountability.

AMY GOODMAN: What would stop the Israeli assault on Gaza, Joshua Hantman?

JOSHUA HANTMAN: Ma’am, what would stop the Israeli assault on Gaza? A commitment for a long-term ceasefire. No more rocket fire. I’m talking about not the trickling in of more rockets and more missiles, but actually Hamas stopping the rocket fire. Let me remind you, ma’am, that the Palestinian Authority, who, by the way, controls Areas A and B in the West Bank and—

JOSHUA HANTMAN: —used to have control also in the Gaza Strip, they’ve just joined a unity government with Hamas—

AMY GOODMAN: We have to end it here.

JOSHUA HANTMAN: —this terrorist organization that’s been firing rockets at Israel. So we call on them to end this unity for terror and make peace.

Finally, in the end this terrorist Jew tells the truth - the objective that's motivate their assault on the Palestinians - cause the to sell one another out, betray their unity government. [Source: Pat Bagley]

Then there is this from Juan Cole:  Stop Saying ‘If X fired Rockets at U.S.’: It’s Racist, & assumes we’re Colonial

Friday, July 4, 2014

Shove Your Anti-Semitism

A must re-print for this day and the Joe Blow Report. I don't always agree with Juan Cole's conclusions, but on this, he's right on the mark - American hypocrisy, a clear symptom of illegitimacy as a nation and it's bastard spawn, Israel.



Americans need to Answer: When WillPalestinians get their Fourth of July?
By  | Jul. 4, 2014 | 
Americans are commemorating the Fourth of July today, the anniversary of the
Declaration of Independence. 
The grievances that the four million inhabitants of British North America had in
1776 were not felt by them to be narrow or specific but rather universal, and so
too was the remedy. They laid against the government of King George III that it
was not serving the interests of its North American subjects. 
Thomas Jefferson wrote,
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” 
All human beings are created equal, the founders of the United States believed. 
That means that Palestinians, as human beings, are also created equal. The text
says “all.” 
Moreover, the Palestinians by virtue of being “men” (i.e. human beings) have
been endowed by God with the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. 
The Palestinians do not have any of these rights, whether God wants them to or not. They were successively ethnically cleansed from their homeland of Palestine by militant Jewish settlers. (There were no Jews in Palestine to speak of as recently as 1800; Bonaparte found about 3,000 I think; Palestine was inhabited by Muslim and Christian Palestinians and as late as 1939 the British mandatory authorities envisaged a Palestinian state in 1949). Some 750,000 were expelled with no compensation and their land and property usurped in 1948. More tens of thousands were displaced in 1967. Their numbers have grown. Some 20 percent of Israel is remnants of the original Palestinian inhabitants, some 1.6 million persons. They are second class citizens in many ways.
But the some 4 million Palestinians who live in the West Bank and Gaza, and the
several hundred thousand living in Lebanese refugee camps, are living lives the
opposite of the ones Jefferson declared natural. They are stateless. In the West
Bank they live under Israeli military rule; there are a few civil institutions, but all
of these can be over-ruled by the whim of the Israeli army. Palestinians do not
control their land, water or air. In Gaza, the Israelis have put them under siege,
including the children and non-combatants in general. They aren’t allowed to
export virtually anything they produce. They have no port or airport (both
bombed by Israel). They suffer from massive unemployment and even
malnutrition. The Israelis have placed the Palestinians of Gaza in a huge open-air
concentration camp. With American and European help. 
In the phrase of Warren Burger, the stateless have no right to have rights. They
do not have the right to life, or liberty, or the pursuit of happiness. They may be
killed with impunity (the Israeli army has killed 9 Palestinians, including children,in its crackdown on the West Bank over the horrific kidnapping and killing
of three Israeli youth. The horrid character of the crime does not authorize Israel to
engage in collective punishment nor Israelis to act as vigilantes and deprive other
people of life or liberty.) 
So the Palestinians do not have a right to life. They have no liberty at all as the US
founding generation conceived it. And they certainly have no right to pursue
happiness. Their lives are constrained and made difficult by deliberate actions of
Israeli officials and officers and armed squatters on their land who torment them. 
The Declaration of Independence insists that people have a right to elect their
government. But Palestinians cannot elect the Israeli government, which actually
rules them (and they cannot elect the Lebanese or Syrian governments either,
where there are significant Palestinian refugee populations). The elections held
after the Oslo process have been undone by deliberate Israeli intransigence.
When Palestinians vote for the Palestine Authority, in any case, they are not
actually getting representation that matters. Unelected forces in Israel still control
their land, air and sea. 
When Palestinians elected a Hamas government in 2006, the Israelis disrupted it
and fomented a PLO coup against it. The Americans in 1776 said of King George,
“He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly
firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.” Palestinian parliamentarians
have been arrested in large numbers by Israeli soldiers on the West Bank. Some
are now again kidnapped. 
The early Americans were angry that King George III took away land at will, which
is something the Israelis routinely do to the Palestinians. They also minded that
he appointed the court judges. The Palestinians have no courts in which to
adjudicate their claims, being forced to litigate in front of unsympathetic Israeli
judges. 
Did the Americans mind that the king was “cutting off our Trade with all parts of
the world?” Israelis are doing that to the Palestinians. Were they angry at him
“for depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury”? The Israelis
arrest and hold people for a very long time without any judicial process. 
The remedy the early Americans applied to these problems, of rising up against
foreign occupying troops, is not available to Palestinians. The Israelis are too
strong, too well armed, and too backed to the hilt by the US Congress, many
members of which have more or less been bribed by pro-Israel donors. Opposing the Israeli occupation is routinely equated in the US to “terrorism,”even though Palestinians are the aggrieved party. But in any case, the Declaration of Independence does not say all men are created equal except those that have some violent people among them. And King George III saw the American revolutionaries as terrorists, too. 
The horrible thing is that US diplomacy and US taxpayers’ money is going
toward keeping the Palestinians stateless and without rights. Americans are
doing to a helpless people exactly the kinds of things they wouldn’t put up with
from King George III for themselves. 
Americans don’t have a responsibility to liberate everyone in the world. But they
do have a responsibility not to help Israel deprive Palestinians of their inalienable
rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
__________
__________
--Joe

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Filthy Mouth

What's with the filthy mouth? More typical low-class, filthy, scummy hypocrisy of a Brownshirt blog and their enablers.

If "Nobigdeal" was to respond to the filthy personal assault in his or her defence he or she would be censored, deleted and block from further participation on the blog for violating "comment rules." This kind of action is perfectly alright with the TE people just as long as they agree with the personal assault - someone defending them and their Brownshirt policies.

This is an issue for two reasons. One, it establishes the total loss of credibility and defines and identifies the purpose or reason for the blogs existence. And two, this is where this kind of worthless opinionated atrocity starts and is justified.

Editor Defends Decision to Drop George Will After Rape Column
“We had a lot of readers very angry and very hurt,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch's op-ed chief explains
And this:  St. Louis Paper Drops George Will Column After ‘Offensive’ Rape Piece

Actually he was dropped because his column was "controversial."

Eric Kirk used the same justifications for censoring and blocking people on his blog. In a Democracy EVERYONE needs to hear and see controversial points of view and understandings. Observations are not the same as worthless opinions. Yet we have people accused, judged and put to death on totally worthless unsubstantiated opinions. That lawlessness and corruption has its roots in these kinds of hypocritical actions and justification. They are all a net negative to the community.

This is just one example:


It isn’t a scoop when you scanner jump and call the police before a press-release is issued. Police need to take care of business instead of calling the blogs.
The police did say they were investigating if there was gang involvement.
All LOCO does is reprint press releases and the Times-Standard labels press releases as breaking news.
All TE does is take stuff and twist it to suit your political agenda. You are just Heraldo regurgitated.
For original news, try the Northcoast Journal.
Liked by you


[Emphasis mine] -- And if for some reason you have a problem understanding what I just said then read this, because if these Brownshirts get their way this is what's coming to America:

JUNE 24, 2014 - by JONATHAN COOK
You Can’t Force-Feed Occupation to Those Who Hunger for Freedom
Israel’s New Abyss
--Joe

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Looking at a Peach of a Gem

And NOT seeing it.

Saturday my wife left early to go do errands and was gone most of the day. That evening when she was reading that day's Times-Standard she asked me if I had read the article by Sharae O'Shaughnessy, How to lose your significant other without really trying? She then said, "If you didn't, you missed a real gem." Then she read the whole article to me. I must say was impressed.

In the past, I must admit, I've not been that impressed with what I did read, so I just passed over this article without looking. She was right, my wife that is, it is a real gem. Life is best lived by positive experience. Learn from the mistakes of other, then move on in life learning from your own mistakes. From now on I'm going to take the time to read what she says. So, if you missed it, here it is posted in it's entirety. ENJOY.


How to lose your significant other without really trying
Eureka Times-Standard, Posted: Sat Jun 07 13:23:00 MDT 2014 Times-Standard.com 
New romance. The possibility of forever. It's one of the most exciting things that can happen to a person. And if it does happen, we put our best foot forward. We take more pride in our appearance, suddenly we remember our manners, we're incredibly ambitious, our energy is renewed and going the extra mile for that someone special is in no way a burden. In short: we campaign. And because we are our best selves during this tedious time we often fall in love with each other's perfect representation of us. When love happens eventually we learn to become comfortable. That's when our true colors show. That's when someone farts or lets their crazy hang out. 
Her: OMG, this jerk NEVER picks up his socks. What a slob. 
Him: Whoa. Did she just give my mom a backhanded compliment? Chill out, Slagathor. 
So here we are. In our true form. The new car smell is now that of socks he won't pick up and that sassy personality you thought was so progressive now just sounds a lot like nagging. I suppose we should throw in the towel because things aren't perfect, right? WRONG! Don't be a quitter! 
I am currently in a relatively new relationship that is beginning to settle into something far more substantial. Spending copious amounts of time in close proximity is the best way to truly expose your final form. I am discovering that my final form was molded over an eight year marriage that was riddled with trouble and now these eight years of learned behaviors are rearing their ugly head and eating away at something that has nothing to do with them. After eight years of being with the wrong people, my ex and I got real good at cutting each other down. By the end, we were professional terrible spouses. Something I'd like to have left behind with the relationship. Unfortunately years of being one way doesn't just shed itself in a few months. In order to make this work, I have to actually work on myself. Puke. Unfortunately I hadn't given myself time to accept that in the wake of one failed relationship many things can happen. A festering guilt can boil to the surface, causing an intense fear that you may be hurt again or you may hurt them enough first to deserve it. In order to be happy with something new I needed to learn that I cannot go from one extreme to the other. Do not expect mountains to move but then don't immediately anticipate the worst. 
I've been doing a lot of research with the goal of adding some tools to my relationship tool box. One reason history is taught in school is the hope that it will prevent us from making the same mistakes in the future. I learn from people who have been there, done that. Following are a few things I've picked up from folks I like to call "Love War Vets": 
Love yourself first. Do away with the insecurities that make you lash out or introvert by accepting yourself. Make improvements where necessary and taking pride in the things you're awesome at. 
It is also vital to remember that you can recover from almost anything. Like, if someone breaks your heart it isn't the end of the world. But the anxiety you feel about the possibility of someone breaking your heart can ruin your life. It's out of your hands. Don't waste a minute worrying about something you have no control over. Insecurities like that can awaken the little green jealousy monster and then you'll have a whole new super fun set of problems. Avoid this at all costs! Jealousy is a symptom of neurotic insecurity which is troublesome to your relationship and torment to yourself. 
The obvious suggestion I'm choosing to address is to always be communicative and honest. Sometimes transparency is painful but knowing your partner won't keep things from you relieves so much anxiety of the unknown. And I know there are those of us who hhhhate talking about our feelings (Me. I'm talking about me right now. My feelings are my own and no one needs to know about them.) But if you don't address the problems head on they will fester until one day you're cleaning up the sticky debris from a messy blow up. These are hard to come back from. Put in the work/dialogue so it doesn't come to this. 
And the silliest but in my opinion most important thing I can suggest is to laugh sincerely and often. It's hard to stay angry, feel lonely or be pessimistic when you're spending the majority of your time together laughing like idiots about nothing and everything. I am lucky in love to have a guy with a solid sense of humor. Even if he is the very definition of a fart machine. Best of luck to everyone brave enough to willingly enter into a new romance. 
Sherae O'Shaughnessy is a Eureka resident, a host at 93.1/94.1 FM KSLG, an emcee, a freelance writer, the founder and owner of BA-DUM-CHH Comedy Presents, was voted Humboldt's Best Comedian 2012 by readers of the North Coast Journal, and writes this column for the Times-Standard. Contact her at shutupsherae@gmail.com.
--Joe 

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

The Brownshirt Solution is a Real Life Tragedy

[UPDATE :: Sunday, June 8, 2014 :: Brownshirt slime show their true colors - the so-called elite in quality blogging shows the folly of voting in local elections. Reminds me of the Triple Crown race at the Belmont Stakes Saturday - a foregone conclusion.]

Where it all starts: The Brownshirt Real Life Tragedy as they touch REAL people with Totalitarian Fascist Solutions.

When I wrote this post I hadn't decided to post it on this blog. However, when I heard the following quote on Democracy Now this morning, I decided I had to say something. By the way, voting for whatever people seem to believe it is worth won't take care of this sickness. The complete article on Democracy Now.
AMY GOODMAN: In an astounding this morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe the — half, if not the majority of the guests and hosts said that he should not have been saved. Given his political views.
JAMES BRANUM: That is insane. In our country we don’t sacrifice our service members based on their political beliefs. That is disgusting, personally.
Apparently we do now. Censoring on blogs for political beliefs or dissenting views is just the beginning.

In the 150 years or so since the Civil War you would naturally believe, after all the World Wars, all the fighting and dying, all the sacrifices that were paid for the right to be free men and women we would be living in a modern utopia of glutinous freedoms and liberties. Rather than living in a world of barbaric cannibals daily gorging themselves on - eating our rights to be free and independent citizens charting our course in this life to all our unalienable rights, i.e.,
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
What we get, and this is a good example, of the real time social barbarism and terrorist philosophy that drives or empowers such darkage beliefs. Some of the end results, in America, the victims are just thrown into solitary confinement for life – a form of tortured murder or execution. It's called indefinite detention, without trial in some cases. These beliefs are then translated into laws that justified some of the worlds most abhorrent despots and murderous tyrants. Today millions of Americans are incarcerated and for what? Not being white? How many innocent people were forced to plead to a police frame-up because stupid or racist jurors and corrupt judges rubber-stamped into prison?

I'm talking about this blog and article: "Another tragic incident, with a pitiful outcome well short of Justice" - Be sure to read the comments to get the full impact.

It all seems innocuous enough, right. Just conversation trying to work out a reasonable solution.
What makes this serious for everyone is how this kind of conduct extrapolates into real life and dramatically affects our social community to its everlasting detriment. You can't spit on the sidewalk without committing a felony. Felons are a permanent sub-class American. The police are lawless in their own right and replicate that attitude when dealing with everyone. When was the last time anyone challenged Humboldt Superior Court Judge Dale Reinholtsen for that position or any other Superior Court Judge locally?

Knee-jerk justice speaks for itself. Extreme knee-jerk laws tend to create injustice. You can't cure a disease by trying to treat the symptoms. Yet that is the panacea everyone believes voting does.

For those that don't know, here is the definition of insanity:
Insanity. n. mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.
Look around more people fit that description than you might think. Especially, all those Brownshirts enforcing and subjecting everyone to their worthless opinions.
--Joe

Thursday, May 29, 2014

The Brownshirt Hypocrite Strikes Again

General Brownshirt Bigot Bans Another. Eric Kirk sets the precedent for raging bigotry, and justification for direct action discrimination against anyone that fails to toe his invisible line on blogs and in our community. Follow comments on local blogs and you find more and more intolerant, bigoted behavior hiding behind a pseudo-community oriented blog. What makes this serious for everyone is how this kind of conduct extrapolates into real life and dramatically affects our social community to its everlasting detriment.

Stumble into one of these blogs, make a comment of a differing point of view or even a factual observation and you find out in a hurry what it feels like to be a person of color or a woman in a backwater berg in the Jim Crow era. Make the mistake of trying to defend yourself or your point of view and you find out what mob rule is all about when you are summarily verbally beaten. If you didn't learn your lesson from these verbal bullies the first time or two and willingly shut up and mind your place like you were told, they permanently silence you.

Here is a verse from Maya Angelou's poem 'Still I Rise' that demonstrates the graphic reality of words followed by another example of such words from one of Eric Kirk's Brownshirts put into practice:
You can shoot me with your words,
You can cut me with your lies,
You can kill me with your hatefulness,
But just like life, I’ll rise.
[Emphasis mine.]

Mitch
Thank you, Nutcase Anonymous, for being accurate in your quote. [Emphasis mine.]


The following action of bigoted discrimination justified by words of hateful lies on Eric Kirk's blog motivated this posting.
May 26, 2014 at 7:43 am  Eric Kirk  
I’m sure the rabbis are all quaking in their boots Steve. That will be your last post as your irrational anger with Jews really has no place here, or anywhere really. You can do this on your own blog. I’m sure your immense following will enjoy your thoughts. [Emphasis mine.]
Notice Kirk's reason for banning Steve from posting on his blog: "irrational anger with Jews." The question I ask is, do any of Steve's comments in this thread demonstrate "evidence" (Kirk's always demanding 'evidence') of "anger" or even "irrational anger" suggesting that Steve in MENTALLY deprived or STUPID? Or, did he simply speak a "truth"? Here is the definition of irrational:
1. without the faculty of reason; deprived of reason.
2. without or deprived of normal mental clarity or sound judgment.
3. not in accordance with reason; utterly illogical.
I've included below what I consider the pertinent comments to this issue of bigoted discrimination. There are other comments in this thread. The first comment by Dave Kirby is included because it is a perfect example of Eric Kirks discrimination and identifies one of his Brownshirts. It also starts the bigoted statements justifying Kirk's banning Steve for trying to defend himself.
It is perfectly okay for this guy, Dave Kirby, a retired real estate salesman living in Garberville, to personally assault Steve. And then turn right around and use this guys lies to justify banning him.

Here are Steve's two comments preceding Kirk's kinetic judgment.
And with that, Kirk summarily censors Steve for speaking an obvious truth or so he says. So, there it is, Brownshirt bigots doing their best to tell everyone what is acceptable and what is not.
--Joe