Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Stancliff knows! HA! HA! HA! -- HAAAH!!!
"Perhaps most disturbing is the sheer blind hatred coming from this church group."Only a "god" know what "evil lurks in the hearts of men." Only a would-be god proclaims his self-righteous judgments before all men. The phenomenal reality of Dave Stancliff is that he also proclaims to know how men think and how they feel. Read his words the Times-Standard published in today's As It Stands: "Snyder v. Phelps: a case of free speech or harassment?"
Albert Snyder suffered as only a father can on that horrible day. He didn't want other parents of military sons and daughters to suffer more than necessary when they had to bury a child. They did not deserve to have hate-spewing extremists shatter the sanctity of the ceremony. [Emphasis added]Yeah! The Shadow knows "hate-spewing extremists" when he sees them, doesn't he?
The self-serving arrogance of the "Dave Stancliff" type of hypocrite is expressed here again and again in his hyperbolic self-righteous tirade against the U.S. Constitution:
In my opinion, this sick church and its 60 members shouldn't be allowed to harass private funerals. *** For Albert Snyder, the case is not about speech rights. It's about harassment, plain and simple. *** Why should anyone be allowed to hijack a private funeral as a vehicle for expression of their hate? *** As a journalist, I respect the First Amendment... *** What this church is doing is wrong.This is the same emotionally driven sentiments expressed against the Muslims and against those particular Muslims that are building a Cultural Center near Ground Zero in New York. First Amendment Constitutional rights including the right granted ALL Americans plus the freedom of and the free expression of all religions only applies to the qualified patriotic natural-born Americans as defined by these American wannabe Elitists gods.
As a patriotic American veteran that swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, I doubt anyone thought they'd see the day someone says they "respect" that Constitution by writing and publishing such emotional inspired and blatant hypocritical contravention.
Once again that ugly head of the Thought Police rises up for all to witness. These are not some obscure innocent little children, victims of some obscene child molester. These are the lives of mature adults that made a conscious and deliberate decision to put THEIR lives up for sacrifice to defend, not the "Dave Stancliff's" of this country, but the United States Constitution. These Dave Stancliff's dishonor the value of these lives of these people as they assault this very Constitution with all their emotional blather.
The Great Authority on such matters, Dave Stancliff says:
I'm not sure what God and what Bible he's referring to, as the Christian Bible abhors acts of hatred like his.You think maybe Stancliff would have everyone believe he's actually referring to the Islamic God and the Koran? My point - what makes Dave Stancliff such an authority on any God or any Bible? Only a wannabe "god" would ever presume such authority to portend such knowledge and personal judgments. The God I worship made this distinction:
"You love what is right and hate what is wrong. Therefore God, your God, has anointed you, pouring out the oil of joy on you more than on anyone else." - Hebrews 1:9 NLT.What is "wrong" is judging your fellow man. What is "right" is to "hate what is wrong." Dave Stancliff and all others that express the same state of being need to take Jesus Christ's actual words to heart:
"Do not judge others, so that God will not judge you, for God will judge you in the same way you judge others, and he will apply to you the same rules you apply to others. -Matthew 7:1 GNT.We can all be sure that none of the parents want to confront the truth of the value sacrificed. In that regard it might be useful to consider these words also written in the Bible, ostensibly about our time. These words are important because they define how God judges men - they are judged by what they are - deluded liars that act on their lies:
"[A]nd in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned (judged) who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness. -2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 NIV, NAS.
[UPDATE :: Monday, September, 20, 2010]
Copied below are the words of the proven bullying extremist that writes the As It Stands column in the Times-Standard newspaper. Like any neurotic extremist he makes more threats and unproven accusations – this is not the first time he's threatened me either. Dave Stancliff, just read what he publicly writes, certainly has no problem slandering and libeling anyone he judges objectionable. For some people in this country and for all practical purposes, Dave Stancliff's assault on the U.S. Constitution and the people that defend that Constitution, that the Times-Standard published for the general public Sunday, makes him, at the very least, another de facto “hate-spewing extremists.”
The Times-Standard wants letters from the general public, preferably local people, about matters and issues written about and published in their paper. They advertise daily and published this article just last Friday, September 17, 2010: "Getting that letter printed". When these letters object or are critical of the newspaper, their reporters, opinion writers and of some issue or subject, as some obviously and regularly are, do they constitute slander, libel and harassment of the paper or writers?
Dave has left a new comment on your post "The Bigot Is Back":
Someday we're going to meet in court Joe.
I'm saving posts like this to prove how you slander and libel me. I thought you were done harassing me...
it seems you just can't just let go of your hatred of me - you hypocrite.
Posted by Dave to Joe Blow Report at September 20, 2010 7:51 AM
[UPDATE II :: Monday, September 20, 2010]
Are these the words of a rational, sane person with the character and qualities needed to justify writing for the Times-Standard newspaper? Why is it that the newspaper, Kimberly Wear in particular, continues to support and enable this kind of reprehensible conduct and behavior? Is there some reason these people responsible for the Times-Standard are incapable or unwilling to accept the self-manifest truth, or to comprehend that Dave Stancliff's public behavior and conduct directly reflects the paper's ethics, morals and credibility in this community? I've already written to the Times-Standard management and showed them what Dave Stancliff is publicly saying and writing. How bad does it get BEFORE someone responsible for that corporation becomes responsible for this kind of horrendous defamation? It's obvious that Kimberly Wear isn't capable of dealing with this matter. Apparently she's to close to the problem. This community deserves better than a newspaper that enables such unjustified, reprehensible conduct.
Dave has left a new comment on your post "The Bigot Is Back":
What about Rose's comment? I don't see you giving an update on her.
Is that because she know's your so far off base that she disagrees with you?
Does that make Rose a bigot because she disagees with you?
You're such a lying hypocrite.
As far as the Times-Standard letters to the editor policy, they don't print anonymous ramblings from extremist cowards so you'll never get one printed Blow boy.
If you aren't afraid of the truth, let's you and I go to court and see who is slandering and libeling who. You won't do this because you are a coward with some bad past to hide - I recall you saying that you couldn't reveal your real idenity or you would have to move to Peru.
Dark secrets Blow boy?
Posted by Dave to Joe Blow Report at September 20, 2010 12:08 PM
What about Rose's comment? I don't see you giving an update on her.
Is that because she know's your so far off base that she disagrees with you?
Does that make Rose a bigot because she disagees with you?
You're such a lying hypocrite.
As far as the Times-Standard letters to the editor policy, they don't print anonymous ramblings from extremist cowards so you'll never get one printed Blow boy.
If you aren't afraid of the truth, let's you and I go to court and see who is slandering and libeling who. You won't do this because you are a coward with some bad past to hide - I recall you saying that you couldn't reveal your real idenity or you would have to move to Peru.
Dark secrets Blow boy?
Posted by Dave to Joe Blow Report at September 20, 2010 12:08 PM
--Joe
Sorry, but the people he is referring to are the worst kind of extremists.
ReplyDeleteDave and I don't agree on much, but on this one, I have to say, he is right on.
Someday we're going to meet in court Joe.
ReplyDeleteI'm saving posts like this to prove how you slander and libel me. I thought you were done harassing me...
it seems you just can't just let go of your hatred of me - you hypocrite.
So they are. So what, Rose? All you've got is one extremist railing against another. What I get are more bullying threats from the local extremist that gets promoted on a weekly basis in the Times-Standard. Show me the difference. He can't and neither can you. Agree with him all you for all the good it will do you two. Two wrongs don't make a right.
ReplyDeleteWhat about Rose's comment? I don't see you giving an update on her.
ReplyDeleteIs that because she know's your so far off base that she disagrees with you?
Does that make Rose a bigot because she disagees with you?
You're such a lying hypocrite.
As far as the Times-Standard letters to the editor policy, they don't print anonymous ramblings from extremist cowards so you'll never get one printed Blow boy.
If you aren't afraid of the truth, let's you and I go to court and see who is slandering and libeling who. You won't do this because you are a coward with some bad past to hide - I recall you saying that you couldn't reveal your real idenity or you would have to move to Peru.
Dark secrets Blow boy?
There are all kinds of protestors and extremists.
ReplyDeleteBut anyone who would do anything to cause more grief for the families who have lost a son, daughter, husband, wife, father or mother - especially one who fought and died for the rights of free speech -I have no words to express what I think should be done to those protestors. There is no punishment on earth that is fitting enough.
It is a sick abuse of our tolerance and our dedication to free speech. Far worse than skinheads, and wannabe Nazis.
That is how I feel about it. There are ways to communicate a point. That path those people have chosen is not the way.
Rose,
ReplyDeleteThere's an extreme difference between free speech and speech, whether written or spoken, that incites acts of violence. What Dave Stancliff says about those people is EXACTLY what he “accuses” them of doing. We either apply the law equally regardless or we live like a pack of wild animals governed by sick feelings and emotions. “There is no punishment on earth that is fitting enough” is exactly the motivation behind the Sunni – Shiite butchery in Iraq and the Hutu – Tutsi massacres in Rwanda. Is that what you are advocating here?
The simple truth is, that your statement to me above dishonors the very lives of all those people that died for EVERYONE'S right to free speech and free religion. It's one thing to disagree over what someone says, it's altogether something else to threaten them with violence for what they say. My wife's great-grandfather was drug out of his home and shot dead in front of his family and all of his neighbors for standing up against people that think like Dave Stancliff, Ernie Branscomb, you and apparently a lot of others. I'd tread lightly, if I were you.